[Business Today] IP Rights in ICT

By KASS International

The information and communications technology industry is unlike any other. It moves faster, disrupts more completely, and creates and destroys competitive advantage at a pace that most traditional industries would find difficult to comprehend. In this environment, intellectual property rights are not a bureaucratic formality or a legal afterthought. They are the commercial infrastructure on which the entire ICT ecosystem is built, and the businesses that understand and manage them well are consistently the ones that come out ahead.

Key Takeaways

Build an IP strategy that keeps pace with your technology

A sector built on intangible assets

What makes ICT distinctive from an IP perspective is that its most valuable assets are almost entirely intangible. The code that powers a platform, the algorithm that drives a recommendation engine, the brand that users trust, the proprietary dataset that trains a machine learning model: none of these are physical objects that can be locked in a safe or insured against fire and theft in the conventional sense. They exist as ideas, as information, and as relationships, and the only mechanism available to protect their commercial value is intellectual property law.

This means that for ICT businesses, IP management is not a peripheral concern that can be delegated to outside counsel and reviewed once a year. It is a core operational function that needs to be woven into the fabric of the business from the earliest stages of development, and it needs to keep pace with the extraordinary speed at which the technology itself evolves.

Software and copyright

Copyright is the foundational IP right for software, and it operates differently from most other IP rights in one important respect: it arises automatically, without registration, at the moment the code is written. In Malaysia, software is protected as a literary work under the Copyright Act 1987, and the copyright owner holds the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, adapt, and communicate the work to the public.

For ICT businesses, the automatic nature of copyright protection is both a strength and a source of confusion. The strength is that every line of original code written by a developer is protected from the moment it is created. The confusion arises because the rules on who owns that copyright are not always intuitive. Code written by an employee in the course of employment belongs to the employer. Code written by a freelance developer, however, belongs to the developer unless a written assignment has been executed. This distinction catches a significant number of businesses by surprise, particularly startups that rely heavily on freelance talent in their early stages and that may discover years later that they do not own the code their entire product is built on.

Open source software adds a further layer of complexity. A large proportion of modern software is built on open source foundations, and the licences under which open source code is distributed impose real obligations on those who use it. Failing to comply with those obligations, whether by not publishing modifications, incorporating open source code into proprietary software in a way that is incompatible with the licence, or failing to provide the required attribution, can expose a business to significant legal risk. For ICT businesses building products on open source foundations, a clear open source policy and regular licence compliance reviews are essential.

Patents and the software question

The patentability of software is one of the most contested questions in global IP law, and the answer varies significantly across jurisdictions. In the United States, software patents have a long history, though their scope has been narrowed by recent court decisions. In Europe, software is excluded from patentability as such, but software-implemented inventions that produce a technical effect may still qualify. In Malaysia, the Patents Act 1983 similarly excludes computer programs as such from patentability, but innovations that use software to achieve a novel technical result in a non-obvious way may be protectable.

Beyond software, the ICT sector generates a wide range of patentable innovations in hardware, semiconductor design, network architecture, communication protocols, and the physical systems that underpin digital infrastructure. For ICT businesses with genuine technical innovations in these areas, patent protection can provide powerful and durable competitive barriers, and building a strategic patent portfolio should be a priority from the earliest stages of product development.

The concept of standard essential patents deserves particular mention in the ICT context. These are patents that cover technology incorporated into an industry standard, such as WiFi, Bluetooth, 4G, or 5G, and their holders are generally required to license them on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms. For ICT businesses that rely on standardised communication technologies, understanding the standard essential patent landscape is an important part of managing both licensing costs and legal risk.

Trademarks and brand protection

In the ICT sector, where products and services are often intangible and where user trust is the primary currency of commercial success, brand protection is of exceptional importance. The trademarks associated with a successful ICT product or platform frequently represent more commercial value than all of the company’s physical assets combined, and protecting them requires a proactive and comprehensive strategy.

For ICT businesses operating in Southeast Asia, the risk of brand imitation is real and persistent. Counterfeit applications that mimic the appearance and functionality of legitimate software, fake social media accounts impersonating established brands, and domain name registrations designed to intercept traffic intended for a legitimate business are all forms of trademark infringement that require active and ongoing enforcement. A trademark registration strategy that covers the key markets in which a business operates, combined with regular monitoring of new filings and domain name registrations, is the minimum required for effective brand protection in this environment.

Trade secrets in the digital economy

For ICT businesses, trade secrets protect the innovations and competitive advantages that are not suitable for patent protection or that a business chooses to keep confidential rather than disclose through the patent process. Proprietary algorithms, machine learning model architectures, training datasets, database designs, and the accumulated technical know-how of experienced development teams are all examples of ICT trade secrets that can represent significant and lasting commercial value.

Protecting trade secrets in an industry characterised by high staff mobility and rapid technological change requires deliberate and sustained effort. Robust employment agreements with clear confidentiality provisions, controlled access to sensitive information, technically enforced security measures, and a cultural emphasis on the importance of confidentiality are all components of an effective trade secret programme. In an industry where a single departing employee can carry enormous amounts of commercially sensitive information in their head, the infrastructure of confidentiality is not optional.

Data: the emerging frontier

Perhaps the most significant IP challenge facing the ICT industry today is the question of how data should be owned, protected, and monetised. Data is the raw material of the digital economy, and the businesses that control large, high-quality, proprietary datasets hold competitive advantages that can be more durable and more commercially significant than any registered IP right.

Yet data itself is not, in most jurisdictions, directly protected by conventional IP rights. There is no copyright in raw facts. There is no patent in a dataset. The protection of data assets therefore relies primarily on contractual arrangements, database rights where they exist, and trade secret protection for datasets that are kept confidential and not made publicly accessible.

As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly dependent on large and high-quality training datasets, the question of who owns training data, what rights attach to AI-generated outputs, and how data assets should be valued and protected in commercial transactions is one of the most pressing and most rapidly evolving areas of IP law. ICT businesses that are building their competitive advantage around proprietary data need to be actively engaging with these questions rather than waiting for the law to settle.

Conclusion

IP rights in ICT are the foundation on which commercial value is built, protected, and grown. Software copyright, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and the emerging frontier of data rights are all dimensions of a protection strategy that no serious ICT business can afford to leave unaddressed. In an industry where competitive advantage can be created and destroyed at extraordinary speed, the businesses that manage their IP with the same rigour they apply to their technology will be the ones best positioned to sustain that advantage over the long term.

In ICT, what you build is only as valuable as how well you protect it.

Have questions about protecting your business? Reach out to our team at kass@kass.asia and let us help you find the right IP solution.

Is your software code actually yours? Let us check.

Stay Informed, Stay Protected – Join Our Newsletter!